Dispersion vs Diffusion – Taylor Dispersion

2025-07-19

Dispersion and diffusion are commonly misunderstood. Both refer to a “spreading” phenomenon but have different mechanisms. Diffusion results from the random motion of molecules and is characterised by a diffusion coefficient, DaD_a. Dispersion on the other hand results from the variable flow-path of a fluid.

To illustrate, let’s look at Taylor dispersion for steady laminar flow in a long pipe with a Poiseuille flow radial velocity distribution:

u=U0(1r2R2)u = U_0(1 - \frac{r^2}{R^2})

Giving rise to the following shape:

Laminar velocity

Suppose we fill the pipe with species A between two planes at a known concentration. Taylor assumed that the axial molecular diffusion is negligible compared to the radial molecular diffusion. After time tt there will be two concentration fronts:

Tracer

Rapid spreading of the tracer in the radial direction results in a profile like so:

Dispersed tracer

Therefore, the dispersed concentration profile is caused by the velocity profile, and not due to axial molecular diffusion.

The axial dispersion coefficient falls out of this analysis as:

Dax=R2U02192DaD_{ax} = \frac{R^2U_0^2}{192D_a}

Importantly, DaxD_{ax} is not a property of the fluid and depends on the pipe radius and mean velocity. In fact, DaxD_{ax} is inversely proportional to the diffusion coefficient!

Accounting for axial molecular diffusion Aris modified the equation for Taylors axial dispersion coefficient to be:

Dax=Da+R2U02192DaD_{ax} = D_a + \frac{R^2U_0^2}{192D_a}

Taylor dispersion is ubiquitous in chemical engineering and important for gas separation using structured adsorbents – a future topic.

© 2025 Sam Affleck. All rights reserved.

Don't miss the next essay.